OccultForum.org

Original post: Torn

mithros, to answer your comment;

i know my view on this topic is not entirely satanic, but it stems from personal griefs of being raised in an overtly catholic place, the school i went to didnt give you a bus pass if you werent (talk about wantin social diversity) and where i live now is so overtly muslim its unsafe to be white.

If being a certain type of person didnt give you disadvantages, then i wouldnt have this veiw, but i think everyone should be treated equally and to do that people shouldnt be blackmailed into a way of life.

To be honest this whole idea could take months of research and debate for me to come up with a reasonable solution to my problem, so dont take what i am saying now to be one.

Original post: m1thr0s

i know my view on this topic is not entirely satanic, but it stems from personal griefs of being raised in an overtly catholic place...

I suspected as much from your earlier post which is why I didn't misread your intention I think...I know this pattern...been through it myself...

In the end I believe that personal rebellion against these kinds of things actually IS the solution and absolutely IS necessary, though it may not be pretty and may not make you especially popular...for awhile at least. But you may find it is finally futile to focus on changing society itself to any great extent. I think your most powerful vehicle of change is yourself. You may have to just get out of the neighborhood or make whatever other outward changes are necessary. You may have to go through your own particular "war with god" etc, until you finally begin to gain the ground you need. None of this is very easy to explain and many will not understand it. That's their problem really...

All I am really saying is to be careful not to slide from one kind of trap into another...

m1thr0s

Original post: Torn

yes i understand.

my biggest gain in this situation has just been to ignore others views, and get on with my life myself, and i understand that unfortunatly the overall social view whilst usually the dumbest is quite often the most influential (as a comparative the football hooligans are always going to win an argument over passive supporters about which players are best despite who may be correct)
and i just have to live with that, pretend to agree with people to get on with my own life.

Original post: Alarum

The 'flood' written about in Rev. may be the recent Tsunami.........just a thought.

Original post: Amur

It'll be the time when we'll get to kick the living s*** of those robotic-half-human-apes covering the planet. (Offense intended) Which metaphorically means to get them to think for themselves and take some responsibility for their actions. Death will probably be one factor to shake them out of the zombie-consumption life. We only need to hit the right kind of virus flying around in space to get a mass-infection to kill off alot of people. So it's not that far away

Original post: Skeptismo118

Amur, the time when we get to kick the living shit out of those robotic-half-human-apes covering the planet was, praise Bob, X-Day, not the Day of Four Motion...

Original post: Amur

Damn, I must've picked the wrong Earth dimension then.
Nevertheless the events advancing from now to then will be very interesting to follow. Things will probably accelerate more and more in the last years.

Original post: frater luciferi

i suppose we could hunt god down =at least the homicidal abrahamic one, and place his head on a spike somewhere. we could all be like , look? heres god, now play nice- and by the way you all are gods. lol.

Original post: Venus666

The 'flood' written about in Rev. may be the recent Tsunami.........just a thought.

Actually, Noah's flood, didnt even cover the whole earth. It was only within that region, that area.. It was a weather anomaly..

Original post: m1thr0s

Uhhh...there is no Noah in Revelations unless we're reading totally different books here...

But honestly folks...do a little homework...John didn't have any special power to see into THESE times at all...His whole campaign was directed against the Roman empire in his own time which he was obsessively opposed to. He cloaked his stuff in metaphor to confuse the enemy, not to attempt to predict events 2000 years into the future. John didn't believe this world would last another 2000 years to begin with. He and his followers thought the end of the world was right on their own doorsteps...

m1thr0s

Original post: frater luciferi

i have to repeat what mithros said. John thought that the end of the world was basically happening-next week in his time. But of course thats probably something that helped him to get through, back when it was a capital crime to be a christian.

<The prophets of the Bible knew it and the first part of its manifstation has aready passed (namely the transit of venus, or "The woman clothed with the sun") which signifies the coming of the new aeon.>

I think there is a piece missing here that should be addressed. There WAS an event, in 1769, that much more closely fits the prophecy. My reading of the Rosicrucian and Newtonian era alchemists seems to point to it - though they are cryptic. On June 3/4, 1769, the Venus transit was followed a few hours later by a total solar eclipse. This is I believe the full manifestation of Lilith as the dragon. But it also means that it was not only a woman clothed in the sun, but also that the moon below her feet. Apparently this alignment of sun moon Earth and Venus is a once-in-a-precession-of-the-equinoxes event

From Abraham Andrewes (in Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum):

This Lyon maketh the Sun set soon,
To be joined to his Sister the Moon:
By way of wedding a wondrous thing,
This Lyon should cause him to beget a King

The Lyon Greene - or Venus (the element copper)

Importantly, in 1769, the Venus Transit was not producing Vesper - it was producing Lucifer. In this sense, "as above", birth of Lucifer. I say this to distinguish against non-transit shifts from evening star (Vesper) to morning star (Lucifer). The "so below" I would note that Napoleon was born a few months later, that same summer, after the total lunar eclipse (the red stone or the white stone ?)

Fast forward to the next Lucifer producing Transit, in 1882 - about 7 years short of the birth of Hitler. But close enough to be a disturbing coincidence, and 1882 was the year of the first-born of the same line.

But there's one more thing about the numeration of the millennium - and this goes to the connection of the Book of Enoch with syncretic elements of Osiris and the 72 accusers - the base number wasn't in fact ten -

The base number is 6 ... that is, from the Book of Enoch, 200 fallen, however consider 200 in the context of a base-6 numeration --> that is counting upwards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22 ....., 53, 54, 55, 100, 101...., 155, 200 Is it possible that the "200" actually is a base-6 representation that would mean, in decimal notation, 72 ?

If so, then the 72 conspirators against Osiris line up with the "200" conspirators against Azazel. Azazel who was bound and sunk into the desert, like Osiris who was bound and sunk in a lead-filled coffin in the Nile or the Ocean. And certainly as Blavatsky notes, Prometheus is the Greek Azazel. So Prometheus = Osiris = Azazel.

Look closely at Athanasius Kircher's Oedipus Aegyptaicus to see the odd way in which 200 is written.