Mr. Alejos wrote:
I don’t see jumping into ritual work as particularly slower, as far as progress goes, than meditation. On that matter I feel like we must define what we consider “progress”, but that sounds like another thread.
The reason I disagree with you is my personal experience with it, and the experience of about 80 students. The vast majority of them hopped around the Golden Dawn orders, or spent years, in some cases decades, practicing the LBRP and MPR. Then, in three months, through a meditative approach combined with meditative energy work, which is actually a simplification of very elaborate ritual to simple visualizations, they make more progress. What is this? I think we all know. Well, if you ever have to ask if you're making progress, you aren't making progress! At the beginning level, it's a rapid transformation and ennoblement of character, a subtle bliss and happiness that perforates meditation and life, and various experiences in meditation. Likewise, I practiced the LBRP and MPR consistently for about a year and a half before I went for a more meditative approach in the beginning, and I had similar results when I made the switch.
That said, ritual is an EXTREMELY fast path later down the line. There are Theurgic rituals, not commonly known, that awaken the energy centers with about one to two orders of magnitude greater (10-100x) speed of the most effective energy meditation techniques, such as the Kriya Yoga technique. The problem? It takes a decade or so of training to make your nervous system and etheric body strong enough to handle the energy of such a ritual, and many other preparatory attainments (see, for example, the list I gave above). Really, the first decade of practice is generally about training the physical and etheric bodies to allow your generally older astral and mental bodies to shine through. Practiced before the preparation, such a ritual is close to useless.
Progress is complicated, like you implied, but I think everyone has some idea of it. At the lower levels of training, which is what we are discussing, the goal is generally Gnosis, experiencing yourself as a part of God in a waking state. Progress can be simplified to the degree to which a particular technique brings you to that state. More practically, this has to do with the preparation of the etheric body and nervous system and the stimulation of the various energy centers, among other things.
Mr.Alejos wrote:
Now on your comment about Crowley's incorporated curriculum. Was meditation, energy work and imagination training not a part of the Golden Dawn curriculum?
None of those three were emphasized in the outer grades, no. That's part of the reason, I think, the order fell; the students weren't evolved or matured, and they were given certain techniques before they were ready.
Mr.Alejos wrote:
Franz Bardon has given a wonderful system of initiation, but it is not for everyone. What I enjoy about his system is that he forces aspirants to develop the internal cornerstone without all the pageantry of ceremonial.
I completely agree.
Mr.Alejos wrote:
I believe all paths are equally efficient and the one chosen should best suit the aspirant’s temperament. I am not certain about how I feel calling one more effective.
All schools of magic are not equal, because quite simply, some (the vast majority of currently established ones) were created by people who didn't know what they were doing. I would support this argument with the observation that there has not been significant advancement in occult literature since Aleister Crowley; the systems are not producing many adepts. Many schools, also, do not even know what Hermeticism or Theurgy is. Most Hermetic orders don't even study the Corpus Hermetica, the closest document to the foundational doctrine of Hermetics that history affords us. Whereas the Corpus Hermetica tells the initiate how he must constaatly strive towards God, the literature of these other authors and schools (I have been through my fair share of them) make no mention of the Good/God. They are not Hermetic or Theurgic, so they are bad Theurgic schools.
There are many paths fit for the various aspirants, absolutely. Different styles, if you will. For example, many of the major martial arts systems were actually outer order schools. The initiate, after having gone through those, would then go on to learn how to enter the meditative states, etc., and attain enlightenment. There are many different systems of magic, like Tantra Yoga, or Sufism, but they all have common elements. They are all good, and no one path is fit for anyone, in my opinion. I agree in that respect; the path depends on the unique student, and his past life associations.
Mr.Alejos wrote:
And I hope you dont mind if I ask why you went through three different schools of initiation?
Haha, a good question! I never went through three different schools of initiation. But, in my first two-three years of magic, I tried out three different systems, before I finally found the particular lineage that I am currently part of. Like you said, magic requires "Persistence, Perspiration", and focus. You can't go hopping from system to system all your life and hope to get anywhere, clearly!