johnathanrs wrote:Did someone teach you this or did you arrive to this belief yourself? Are you sound in believing this or open-minded to a different philosophy? Before I say anything, let me warn you that I believe in what I am about to tell you. I realize that I am about to try to convert you from your path of ideology - you have been forewarned - which is something that I try not to do because I don't want to spread propaganda and falsely lead others when I am not at a level to be a leader, but perhaps I am the one who needs to converted and recognize my limitations in this. If you so choose to do dance here with me, I will need more guidance from you for me to become a believer in your philosophy and ways.
Nobody's ever taught me, I've come to my own conclusions from my own research. That's not to say nobody has influenced my way of thinking, obviously. Again, my train of logic is based on balance. Let's assume that we have a statement, A. Let's assume that statement B is challenging it.
Is B more logical / makes more sense / is more probable to happen than A?
Is either A or B exhibited or not in real life?
Is B compatible with the foundations of any amount of previous learning?
johnathanrs wrote:If you don't mind, a bit of context here. I have dived into the free will world and went down into the rabbit hole and came up empty handed. Perhaps you can provide a map for me. You see, I became lost because logic itself breaks apart at a certain point. After contemplating a few things - I came to the conclusion that everything is zero sum only to the level of consciousness. Consciousness representing beings that have passed the threshold of free will. I, also, recognize the fact that this previous comment is arrogant as well because it may be that all beings, even ones that we don't believe to possess free will, in fact do and we, the human species, possess simply a greater free will than others on our planet, where beings greater than us possess even greater features of free will. Free will may in fact be a mechanism of choose , and the greater your level within the system/aka universe, the more unlocking of abilities of choice is allowed. All possibilities essentially exist. As a spirit living as a human, you are bounded by certain limitations of free will that have been placed within the environment of the universe or what we call life. A alien species living in the universe may in fact possess a greater form of free will, where more choice is available, such as abilities like telepathy.
Simple here, actually. Free Will isn't Intelligence. Let me put it like this.. Intelligence is a measure of capability of using Consciousness, and this capability comes from the biological hardware the being is equipping. Think like this.. can the ancient Commodore 64 run Windows 10? No, because it's body is simply unable to. What's Windows 10 then our metaphor for? Intelligence. Then what's Free Will? It is the user sitting at the computer, using an old Commodore to do his best, not even knowing that there can exist higher tasks that Windows 10 can perform, etc.
johnathanrs wrote:Under the scenario of me being able to hypothetically being able to talk to what we would call a lower life form on our planet such as a reasoning bee/ant/lion/horse; I would expect for them to honestly provide a philosophy similar to yours.
The next most Intelligent animals on the plane are dolphins, cats, dogs, and elephants. Each is restricted by their biological body's capabilities, just as we are.
johnathanrs wrote:In truth, your philosophy is frightening to me because it means that evil itself equate to goodness - which means if your logic is correct then serial killers like Ted Bundy are justified in their actions... because if Ted Bundy simply construes his actions as a protector of the planet then the act of killing any parasite of humans is justified because they all contribute to the planets demise, no different than any human who desires to kill a flee infestation even if some of those flees may be noble good flees that hypothetically may have there best interest in mind.
Exactly. You won't ever find anyone who's done something they haven't justified from their perspective of things, somehow or the other.
johnathanrs wrote:If one no longer cares about the principles of morals, eliminating from their consciousness the belief of right and wrong, then naturally one can only gravitate towards whatever senses they are feeling at the time such as impulses like mating, eating, exc. Like a lion who is hungry who doesn't base their actions on killing, but on a impulse that they must feed, and whatever creature should happen to present itself to it at the time, that it doesn't hold a relationship with, is to be feed upon. If this is the true model that represents life itself, then if anything, it means that free will, having a choice between choosing what side you are apart of either A) A being of good or B) a being of evil put into context of whatever level of environment you happen to be apart of at the time, is a step below primates who do not possess free will but are environmental automation that are impulse driven. A bee that doesn't question why it's job is to pollinate a flower, it only knows that it should, and lacks the abilities to even contemplate why it fulfills this function within the cycle of life. Free will to me is having a choose to pick your role and pick your side, which to me is a greater ability and a more evolved ability, because it represents endless possibility and the gift of responsibility.
That's exactly how it works. Since you already understand this, I'm just going to address what you're maybe hinting at...
Yeah. They do have a "soul". The one "living thing" I personally doubt whether they have souls or not are plants. Plants have no real cognitive capability apart from a few specialized sensors (eg. phototropism). They're not making conscious decisions (they have no choice either because their bodies are incapable of doing anything else, never mind host a soul), as opposed to animals who can at the very least exhibit fight-or-flight decision making.
johnathanrs wrote:Now, this isn't to say that for beings who do possess our level of free-will that we cannot choose to become apart of negativity or positive, what one would call goodness and evilness, and that is where I am lost. Negative = Positive? I turn to science here, like newton, and follow what god shows us. According to chemistry laws, a neutral atom, what I metaphorically represent all life as, can become a ion by taking on a negative or positive charge, or what we would call evil and good. Just as a atom can become anything, its path is dictated by what type of atoms makeup represents its current shifting phase. I could go on here much more deeply, but you get the basic principle.
Where am I going wrong with my current understanding?
You're asking why good & evil exist in the first place. Again, matter of perspective. Given situation, anything can be considered good or evil. The earth is so big and full of so many circumstantial instances that honestly there is no such thing as good or evil - but there is a faux concept of "greater good" in the sense that the result of an action should benefit an existing collective (society) rather than to cause it damage in any shape or form, in case that hinders it in its current path of progress. Now what's to say that the current path is the right one? Not much. Like you've pointed out before, humans are damaging their location on the way. That's not to say that they haven't progressed. Is the progress ideal? No. Is the current path benefiting some more than others? Yes. Is that fair? No. Is it too late to go back to fix things? Yes. But is it possible to go back? Yes. Will going back reduce the human race's current maximum capability? Yes. Can we fix things down the line? Yes. But are we going in the path where fixing things happens soon? No.
Knowledge is ultimate power. That's the only way you know whether the result of a decision will bring more benefits than damages; if the immediate damages are greater in amount than the benefit, if the long term benefit is crucial and worth every ounce of the damage caused. You must seek to balance your justification by yourself and hope that others understand/see/agree with your reasoning.
johnathanrs wrote:Also, I am not being visited by spirits, I am embedded with one according to a spiritual website that I came across, does your advise change under this scenario? Thank you for the time.
Unless it is talking about your "soul" as the spirit that is embedded in the body, the entire website's philosophy is flawed versus current observations and understandings and you'll have to share it so we can have a look for ourselves to see what they're implying.