OccultForum.org

3 different people all claiming that they have solved it.

https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/publ ... -solution/

https://www.beds.ac.uk/news/2014/februa ... -professor

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/04/r ... anuscript/

Except none of them say at all what it says...Kinda weak if you ask me, as I want to know what it says.

Stukov wrote:Except none of them say at all what it says...Kinda weak if you ask me, as I want to know what it says.

My thoughts exactly.

However, the first link seems to have at least some interest in going over the whole book and has at least discovered some of the sources of the book.

https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366& ... 0wnPXhN850

https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/relig ... lchemy.pdf

Shawn Blackwolf wrote:https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366& ... 0wnPXhN850

https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/relig ... lchemy.pdf

How is that relevant?

If you really read the links , and put two and two together ,
Desecrated , it is *extremely* simple... [wink]

The text , is speaking of plants , water , stars...

Spyragics , as art of alchemy , is speaking of plants , water / other liquids ,
and astrological influences...

I state , not posit , that the manuscript is describing a highly advanced method
of spyragics , based on using not just planetary influences , yet star constellations ,
in alchemical processes , and until some serious alchemist looked at the manuscript ,
with someone who is a translator , it's full depth shall remain unrealized , and thus
untranslatable... [thumbup]

Shawn Blackwolf wrote:If you really read the links , and put two and two together ,
Desecrated , it is *extremely* simple... [wink]

The text , is speaking of plants , water , stars...

Spyragics , as art of alchemy , is speaking of plants , water / other liquids ,
and astrological influences...

I state , not posit , that the manuscript is describing a highly advanced method
of spyragics , based on using not just planetary influences , yet star constellations ,
in alchemical processes , and until some serious alchemist looked at the manuscript ,
with someone who is a translator , it's full depth shall remain unrealized , and thus
untranslatable... [thumbup]

I can understand why you would think that. But go back and read the first link that I posted.

I thoroughly read it before I posted...

And , if I did not mention it , I met Robert , at the International
Alchemists Conference , years ago , along with others...

David Hauk , who did the intro to his book , gifted me with three
day passes for myself and a friend , due to my knowledge...

He put the conference on...

One of the main things to remember , in all ancient languages ,
and writings , is the layered information technique , where there
is a first layer of making translation difficult , often by multiple
languages used , pages out of order ( or "no index" ) , strange
illustrations , all a form of initial code...

Then , should someone translate it , there is the "surface reading"...

Something that "appears" to make sense...so most would stop there ,
and declare the work translated...

Then there is the layer where if one has been initiated , they have
the key , or "decoder ring" to unveil the further levels to the code
and texts / manuscripts / grimoires / books of shadow...

If I must , I can show you how the plant medicine , and astrology ,
are in the code I work with , the magnetics , the water , even the
relation to the Sun / ( Collossus Of Rhodes ) / Phoenix , and the
two pillars which held the statue...all in the code , used to encrypt
and decrypt the document...

As well , the idea of imbibing the "waters" to accelerate the transmutation
and the "transfiguration into light"...

Yet , for now , I shall leave it at that...and just say , it is good , that person
has stripped one layer partially away , for the "common folk"...

One day , perhaps an initiate shall be listened to , and be convinced to share
full knowledge of the code with the academic community , so another level
may be revealed...

I just don't see the world the way you do.

Good answer , well said , and I think we can both thank
the Powers That Be , we see differently... [thumbup]