No God proven?

Exploring the Philosophical side of the Occult.
Post Reply
User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Because God is a singularity, and because I perceive I am therefor God as the only perception in Existence a singularity. Or we are all Gods as proven.
http://imgur.com/NqzHI7S
Image



Also surface to time, the beginning. We're all built of warped time
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

And everything is beginning to exist on something, and God is beginning to exist on something and disconnect from nothing.

Magick:
Have the personality mindset of disconnecting 'descriminately with fastest speed' with unpleasants and beginning toughnesses to presented thoughts. Disconnect from disconnects[concept created as spell] to think something perfect. Channel Existence.

Thoughts are presented by predestined compel.
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
Hadit
Adept
Adept
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:09 am

Re: No God proven?

Post by Hadit »

What?
Beloved of Set

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Hadit wrote:What?
God could only exist if God was alone in existence. Thus others are false people; automatons.
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
Maya The Generator
Adept
Adept
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:26 am

Re: No God proven?

Post by Maya The Generator »

Raine plz. That is plain trolling. [tongue]
Illusion is the first of the pleasures.
The bomb of entropic chaos.
If some assholes levels a twelve gauge your way, you drain him, skin him and bash in his skull. Self-preservation is vital part of humanity after all. My favorite part, in fact
My mind is telling me NOOO but my BODY, MY BODY is telling me YEAS

User avatar
magari
Adept
Adept
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:43 am
Location: Colorado

Re: No God proven?

Post by magari »

God is singularity and its contrast, the opposite pole, and the middle.

You are God because you are a piece of the whole.

You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.

You don't have to believe in gravity for it to be real, it existed before Isaac Newton.

User avatar
corvidus
Adept
Adept
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by corvidus »

magari wrote:God is singularity and its contrast, the opposite pole, and the middle.

You are God because you are a piece of the whole.

You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.

You don't have to believe in gravity for it to be real, it existed before Isaac Newton.
Isaac Newton ;)
1) Tis true without lying, certain & most true.
2) That which is below is like that which is above & that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracles of One Only Thing.
3) And as all things have been & arose from One by the mediation of One: so all things have their birth from this One Thing by adaptation.
and then he goes on to translate the rest of the Emerald Tablet...
Free yourself from the seduction of words.

Draco20
Initiated
Initiated
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by Draco20 »

Sounds like mumbo jumbo to me. I don't quite get what you mean by 'Singularity'? Is it God as the totality of evertyhing (a la Pantheism)?
magari wrote:You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
But then God or Gods might not necesserely be omniscient or omnipotent. A God could be very powerful but limited in some ways.

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Phenix20 wrote:Sounds like mumbo jumbo to me. I don't quite get what you mean by 'Singularity'? Is it God as the totality of evertyhing (a la Pantheism)?
magari wrote:You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
But then God or Gods might not necesserely be omniscient or omnipotent. A God could be very powerful but limited in some ways.
What God is is a mystery, but God would still be the only perspective in existtence, the only perceiving being. Everyone else would be blind subaspects of God thus making God the archbeing of all and thus a singularity. Beginning of time is a singularity.

God is also limited in that God could only exist AFTER the beginning of time. Thus that would translate into some limitations of power as a reflection of physics to available expression.
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

RaineAshford wrote:
Phenix20 wrote:Sounds like mumbo jumbo to me. I don't quite get what you mean by 'Singularity'? Is it God as the totality of evertyhing (a la Pantheism)?
magari wrote:You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
But then God or Gods might not necesserely be omniscient or omnipotent. A God could be very powerful but limited in some ways.
What God is is a mystery, but God would still be the only perspective in existtence, the only perceiving being. Everyone else would be blind subaspects of God thus making God the archbeing of all and thus a singularity. Beginning of time is a singularity.

God is also limited in that God could only exist AFTER the beginning of time. Thus that would translate into some limitations of power as a reflection of physics to available expression.
Because I perceive there is a 1 in 1 probability that I am God. That is the theory of God, if there was a God then whomever was perceiving would be guaranteed to be God, with or without amnesia/knowledge of being God.
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
Haelos
Adept
Adept
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:36 am

Re: No God proven?

Post by Haelos »

Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?

Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.

Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.

Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.
.
.
.
"God is an imprecise name for the only thing in the universe that actually exists."
.
Tell me what you know about darkness, and I will tell you about the light.
.
.
Selected Contributions;
Planetary Associations of Common Intoxicants
The Mysteries of Death

https://hdagaz.wordpress.com/

User avatar
magari
Adept
Adept
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:43 am
Location: Colorado

Re: No God proven?

Post by magari »

Haelos wrote:Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?

Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.

Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.

Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.

You definitely seem to be the only one getting so upset... yes.

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Haelos wrote:Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?

Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.

Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.

Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.
Reach Zen. Please. You're so far behind in magick and it's obvious to me. The Gods[Deity Type Gods] talk to me every day.

I bet you didn't know deities have sex.
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
Hadit
Adept
Adept
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:09 am

Re: No God proven?

Post by Hadit »

Haelos wrote:Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?

Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.

Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.

Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.
Possibly.
Beloved of Set

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Read my work before you critisize it. Free: https://www.scribd.com/doc/268392276/Bl ... d-Revision
_______________________________________________

Image

Draco20
Initiated
Initiated
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by Draco20 »

RaineAshford wrote:What God is is a mystery, but God would still be the only perspective in existtence, the only perceiving being. Everyone else would be blind subaspects of God thus making God the archbeing of all and thus a singularity. Beginning of time is a singularity.
Not sure about 'blind subaspect of Gods'. We do have a perspective from the construct of our physical reality, one that seems to be evolving.

Human beings are limited in their ability to process Reality, that's true. You may try to teach philosophy to a dolphin or an elephant, I strongly doubt you'll ever be succesful either. These species have limited cognitive abilities, evolution did not allow them to grasp as much as we do (which might still be very little..) There is really no reason for me to believe that human beings are fully aware of the Ultimate Reality but that doesn't mean we are totally blind. One may catch a glimpse, like a lightning bolt in the obscurity but we are largely ignorant and wondering What It's All About. There could as well be a great deal more to this Reality, a whole realm of possiblities that we simply cannot perceive. We can only try to keep pushing forward, unraveling as much mysteries as we can but in the end we may still be like fishes in an aquarium.
RaineAshford wrote:God is also limited in that God could only exist AFTER the beginning of time. Thus that would translate into some limitations of power as a reflection of physics to available expression.
Before , after, beginning and end are purely human constructs. I don't think these concepts are relevant when speculating about 'God'.
Last edited by Draco20 on Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:14 am, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Phenix20 wrote:
RaineAshford wrote: I don't believe we are necesserely blind subaspect of Gods. We do have a perspective in the construct of our physical reality, one that seems to be evolving.
Then we evolve to Gods. Or as I like to see it, we are already Gods evolving to Deities.
_______________________________________________

Image

User avatar
Haelos
Adept
Adept
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:36 am

Re: No God proven?

Post by Haelos »

You're probably right that I'm the only one being upset about it, Magari.


Raine, I have read your work. You've posted a bunch of it. That's why I feel like I'm able to criticize your writings.
Barely a shred of it makes sense, and the parts that do are so far deluded in nonsense and made up words that I can't even begin to try and correct or comment on any of it.
Deities may speak directly to you, but if you're too fucking insane to make any sense, then what they have to say isn't worth much. There's something called the "Shamanic Return".
You clearly missed your stop.

I'm a betting man, and I'm willing to offer a lot to say that you're lost in either delusion, insanity, or idiocy, and either of which, it's not worth very much to productivity.
I'm willing to admit my deficiencies. You piss me off. It's not something I'm happy with.
.
.
.
"God is an imprecise name for the only thing in the universe that actually exists."
.
Tell me what you know about darkness, and I will tell you about the light.
.
.
Selected Contributions;
Planetary Associations of Common Intoxicants
The Mysteries of Death

https://hdagaz.wordpress.com/

Draco20
Initiated
Initiated
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by Draco20 »

Haelos wrote:You're probably right that I'm the only one being upset about it, Magari.
Well, I have a hard time understanding what the OP means as well. It doesn't seems fully coherent but then I am not familiar with his ideas. Especially his above sketch of the Big Bang and commentaries which I simply don't get.
Last edited by Draco20 on Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shinichi
Adept
Adept
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: Earth

Re: No God proven?

Post by Shinichi »

Ground thyself, Haelos. Disagreeing with someone is fine, losing your peace over it is not. This persons opinions are not worth the stress you are inflicting upon yourself.

Raine, you may find benefit in contemplating the nature of Macrocosm and Microcosm. The bulk of this thread shows you lack an understanding of their fundamental nature and relationship, which is important to understanding the nature of "God" and the nature of human spirit. It's all extremely simple. Stop trying to over complicate it.



~:Shin:~

Draco20
Initiated
Initiated
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:25 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by Draco20 »

RaineAshford wrote:Then we evolve to Gods. Or as I like to see it, we are already Gods evolving to Deities.
I don't know. We'll die but what happens next? That's a mystery no one can answer with absolute certainty. Maybe (hopefully) our consciousness survives and we pass on to other realms of existences or we reincarnate to keep experiencing and learning from the physical world.

User avatar
Maya The Generator
Adept
Adept
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:26 am

Re: No God proven?

Post by Maya The Generator »

Haelos wrote:You're probably right that I'm the only one being upset about it, Magari.
You are not the only one.

Sad thing many brothers are leaving but I agree with them. Their actions are expected.
Illusion is the first of the pleasures.
The bomb of entropic chaos.
If some assholes levels a twelve gauge your way, you drain him, skin him and bash in his skull. Self-preservation is vital part of humanity after all. My favorite part, in fact
My mind is telling me NOOO but my BODY, MY BODY is telling me YEAS

User avatar
RaineAshford
Adept
Adept
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: No God proven?

Post by RaineAshford »

Nothing could have unfrozen time, therefor paradox exists and multiple perspectives exist.
_______________________________________________

Image

Post Reply

Return to “Reason and Unreason”