http://imgur.com/NqzHI7S

Also surface to time, the beginning. We're all built of warped time
God could only exist if God was alone in existence. Thus others are false people; automatons.Hadit wrote:What?
Isaac Newtonmagari wrote:God is singularity and its contrast, the opposite pole, and the middle.
You are God because you are a piece of the whole.
You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
You don't have to believe in gravity for it to be real, it existed before Isaac Newton.
and then he goes on to translate the rest of the Emerald Tablet...1) Tis true without lying, certain & most true.
2) That which is below is like that which is above & that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracles of One Only Thing.
3) And as all things have been & arose from One by the mediation of One: so all things have their birth from this One Thing by adaptation.
But then God or Gods might not necesserely be omniscient or omnipotent. A God could be very powerful but limited in some ways.magari wrote:You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
What God is is a mystery, but God would still be the only perspective in existtence, the only perceiving being. Everyone else would be blind subaspects of God thus making God the archbeing of all and thus a singularity. Beginning of time is a singularity.Phenix20 wrote:Sounds like mumbo jumbo to me. I don't quite get what you mean by 'Singularity'? Is it God as the totality of evertyhing (a la Pantheism)?
But then God or Gods might not necesserely be omniscient or omnipotent. A God could be very powerful but limited in some ways.magari wrote:You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
Because I perceive there is a 1 in 1 probability that I am God. That is the theory of God, if there was a God then whomever was perceiving would be guaranteed to be God, with or without amnesia/knowledge of being God.RaineAshford wrote:What God is is a mystery, but God would still be the only perspective in existtence, the only perceiving being. Everyone else would be blind subaspects of God thus making God the archbeing of all and thus a singularity. Beginning of time is a singularity.Phenix20 wrote:Sounds like mumbo jumbo to me. I don't quite get what you mean by 'Singularity'? Is it God as the totality of evertyhing (a la Pantheism)?
But then God or Gods might not necesserely be omniscient or omnipotent. A God could be very powerful but limited in some ways.magari wrote:You are not God because you are not all omniscient or omnipresent.
God is also limited in that God could only exist AFTER the beginning of time. Thus that would translate into some limitations of power as a reflection of physics to available expression.
Haelos wrote:Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?
Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.
Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.
Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.
Reach Zen. Please. You're so far behind in magick and it's obvious to me. The Gods[Deity Type Gods] talk to me every day.Haelos wrote:Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?
Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.
Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.
Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.
Possibly.Haelos wrote:Am I still the only one on these forums who realizes how ridiculous this person is?
Seriously, everything written by Raine is a jumble of garbage and half-theories that literally mean nothing to anything.
Don't blame poor English skills. We've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is 0 language barrier between Canadian English and American English. I can comprehend poor writing fine. This is worse than poor writing.
Posts like this, and the serious attitude of those who respond shred my faith in this community. There's a reason you haven't seen me around too much, and crap like this is it.
Not sure about 'blind subaspect of Gods'. We do have a perspective from the construct of our physical reality, one that seems to be evolving.RaineAshford wrote:What God is is a mystery, but God would still be the only perspective in existtence, the only perceiving being. Everyone else would be blind subaspects of God thus making God the archbeing of all and thus a singularity. Beginning of time is a singularity.
Before , after, beginning and end are purely human constructs. I don't think these concepts are relevant when speculating about 'God'.RaineAshford wrote:God is also limited in that God could only exist AFTER the beginning of time. Thus that would translate into some limitations of power as a reflection of physics to available expression.
Then we evolve to Gods. Or as I like to see it, we are already Gods evolving to Deities.Phenix20 wrote:RaineAshford wrote: I don't believe we are necesserely blind subaspect of Gods. We do have a perspective in the construct of our physical reality, one that seems to be evolving.
Well, I have a hard time understanding what the OP means as well. It doesn't seems fully coherent but then I am not familiar with his ideas. Especially his above sketch of the Big Bang and commentaries which I simply don't get.Haelos wrote:You're probably right that I'm the only one being upset about it, Magari.
I don't know. We'll die but what happens next? That's a mystery no one can answer with absolute certainty. Maybe (hopefully) our consciousness survives and we pass on to other realms of existences or we reincarnate to keep experiencing and learning from the physical world.RaineAshford wrote:Then we evolve to Gods. Or as I like to see it, we are already Gods evolving to Deities.
You are not the only one.Haelos wrote:You're probably right that I'm the only one being upset about it, Magari.